We differentiated our ideas about the research agenda from the evaluation efforts of Horizon. We see the evaluation process as dealing with two issues: monitoring the project for the purpose of refinement (formative) and assessing the extent to which the project meets its goals (summative).
We see the educational research as an attempt to gather information that would be interesting to the educational community at large (perhaps publishable) beyond the focus of the evaluation. Within that context, we distinguish between (1) research conducted by the university faculty and (2) research conducted by the participants (action research) in collaboration with the university faculty.
-CBAM (?)
Through a case study of the teachers, determine aspects of professional development that effect change in teachers’ knowledge and/or skills.
Choose a sample of participants. Through a series of interviews, learn their history of professional development—what they learned, what was effective, what was ineffective, what they would choose if they could design their own professional development. What features of their programs of professional development (including Revitalise) were effective/ineffective?
Aspects of project that reduce sense of isolation. Since this is such an important goal of the project, it might be valuable to address it at a deeper level than what will be possible in the evaluation effort by Horizon.
1. Facilitate design and implementation of classroom research by teacher participants (to be determined in collaboration with them).